If one is stuck on a premise which is wrong, one can never learn anything new.
Examine the premise(s).
If a premise is wrong, everything which follows from that premise is also at least partially false, if not 100%. wrong.
Arguing "details," when the premise is wrong, just yields more garbage.
That being said, many stories handed down in History could be perfectly true, but just set in the wrong context, the wrong named moment of Time (Date)?
"New Chronology by Fomenko and Nosovskiy is the most significant discovery in XX century"
Alexander Alexandrovich Zinowjev
«Scaliger me seduxit» ,
Scaliger seduced me
«Terret me, ut video, studium chronologicum»
Scares me to see a chronological study
-Iohannes Keplerby Anatoly T. Fomenko (Author)

"Think positive and good thoughts about others to avoid negativity affecting your own life."
Mirrored from zenvis50 channel; SpyTube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCovrg-HM0EbpZuZhrGZd0Ng


As with a lot of research, The "official story" can easily be proved wrong; but to tell what really happened is much harder, if not impossible to detail with exactingness.
But the outline of what was likely, is fairly easy to make out, and of course open to further study / revelation.

"Created finally in the XVI century A.D. and accepted today chronology and history of the ancient and medieval world,evidently contains big mistakes.
Many outstanding scientists understood it and discussed during / over a long period of time. But it appeared to be a difficult task to build a new, non-contradictory concept of chronology.
Starting from 1975 a group of mathematicians, mainly from the Moscow State University, were engaged in the development of this problem. Interesting results were received and published both in scientific periodical print and in separate monographs. We underline, that new concept of chronology is based, mainly, on analysis of historical sources WITH THE METHODS OF MODERN MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS and vast COMPUTER CALCULATIONS.

The task of chronology is to put in order the events into proper way on a temporary scale based on the available information. This task naturally fits into the field of applications to modern mathematical statistics, theory of information. The methods of humanities, one of which is history, are not enough for solving chronological issues. New chronology imposes another psychological picture of perception of the antiquity. Now the word "antiquity" should be connected with XV-XVII centuries A.D. that is with the events, distant from us on 300-400 years. Expression "high antiquity" should now relate to the XIII-XIV centuries A.D. And the words "the highest antiquity" – are already the XI-XII centuries A. D. BEFORE THE X-XI CENTURIES A.D. THE EPOCH OF SILENCE OF WRITTEN DOCUMENTS COMES. (See the book RECONSTRUCTION).
Our analyses of the chronology and history opened a striking circumstance. Based on the applied by us mathematical methods it was proved, that the Scaligerian chronology, and therefore also the Scaligerian history of the "antiquity" and the Middle Ages, is totally wrong. Moreover, it appeared that our history right up to the end of the XVI century was consciously falsified at the epoch of the XVII-XVIII centuries.

A.T.Fomenko, G.V.Nosovskiy"
"Do you believe everything you are told without question?
Open your eyes and question your reality, it may not be what you believe.
Help The Tiger Network with some bitcoin here is the address: 1KiJD44WeWKaDb4Newr7bDXadtGn21ACqY

This Vid is through a company directly associated with A. Fomenko research group and is different from that which is the 'Soup of the Soup" i.e. watered down or changed.
It's presented unadulterated, potent and without intermediary.
People who claim "Authentic" and 'Approved' and "Official" - sometimes are not, use your own discretion as best as possible
The work in this field has just begun so there should be room for everyone
Most of the books are in Russian.

Shills state the conclusions, or mis-state the conclusions and pronounce it bunk.
Yet, neglect to examine the details, which is a well- known reaction / story / sophism
Have an open mind to go ahead and consider this; without an open mind to start, you'll waste your time.

I put his in "Faith" section, since the Chronology work bears on the Historical data contained in the Bible, not to dispute what is there, but to place it in a different context, in terms of timing, than has been assumed by the Faithful.



What if many things, you were sure of, turned out to be false?
where to send the BitCoin to support Tiger Network, which allows material, censored elsewhere, to be seen by our esteemed audience
bitcoin address: 1KiJD44WeWKaDb4Newr7bDXadtGn21ACqY

A voice only comes by once.
This show is slowed down to enable absorption and reflection upon material presented.

Good to contemplate at leisure, rather than rush through